Log in

Messages of Support

Messages and responses received from our contact with elected representatives and other items of interest

  • 06 Oct 2026 5:30 PM | Anonymous

    20 September 2026

    Dear Premier Rocklif,

    We hope you are well.

    We are current and past members of the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery’s (TMAG’s) Young People’s Reference Panel (YPRP, the panel). The panel’s purpose is to engage and empower people aged 7 to 17 and help the Museum respond to what maters most to younger generations.

    We love volunteering for the museum because we really care. So many Tasmanian children have their first memories at TMAG! It’s the heart of Hobart and we absolutely love it. 

    When we heard about your idea of saving money by asking TMAG to cut up to 20 jobs (30% of its people) we felt worried for staff and the existence of programs like the YPRP and the children’s festival Lift Off. If there was no panel how would youth voices be heard? How would TMAG remain relevant to kids? What if governments made cuts like this every couple of years - would our favourite place even continue to be open?

    TMAG is not just a place to see exhibitions. It’s a place for learning, creativity, science, festivals, family days, sharing collections, school trips, holiday programs, work experience and so much more. There are always interesting things to do at the museum for free.

    But TMAG can’t keep doing all this with less money. It needs money and staff because it has a really important job to do - telling Tasmania’s stories, bringing joy to locals and visitors from around the world, and keeping treasures safe for future generations.

    As panel members, we are lucky to see behind the scenes at TMAG and how much work goes into maintaining, preserving, researching and interpreting the collection for future generations. How sad would it be if funding cuts meant that the collections suffered and we didn't have all the cool things in the future!

    We also get to work with all the different staff who make the museum run. Being part of TMAG is a very special thing. You can learn a lot, make new friends, have a say, and maybe see your own ideas on the walls. The people who work there are like a family; everyone has a special place, they know and share so much. Anyone who lost their job at TMAG would be missed, especially those who help with all the things for children.

    Young people deserve a say in important decisions like this. We are not just here to be taught; we have views and if we were listened to more often we could help prevent sad things happening in our world. The news of the proposed job losses at TMAG has made us feel annoyed, angry, sad and anxious but we hope you agree that money is not always the most important thing.

    There is only one TMAG and it’s been here for ages. We are all so lucky to have such a wonderful museum. It is not the role of the museum to make money – TMAG brings thousands of visitors to Hobart and gives everything it does back to the community for free. All we need to do is keep caring for it.

    Please listen to us when we ask for no funding cuts to TMAG. Please consider increasing your support for the museum’s amazing staff. Our history, culture and future generations are worth it.

    Yours sincerely,

    Anneliese A. (14), Miranda A. (13), Erika A. (11), Madeleine P. (13), Ettie T. (12), Everett T. (8).


  • 06 Oct 2026 8:45 AM | Anonymous

    Dear Premier and Mr Jaensch

    I am appalled at the latest news coming out of TMAG with now a further two senior curators being asked to compete for the same job. I do not know who is making these decisions but they obviously have no idea of what these jobs consist of, and the qualifications required to deliver them. This is in addition to the axing of Dr Jean Jarman and Dr Gintaras Kantvilas at the Herbarium, once again both highly qualified and specialised curators.

    I write this as a former State public servant in the Premier’s department, in the Department of State Growth and an employee of TMAG. After my retirement in 2007 I started as a volunteer at the Museum as I could see that I could make a contribution to office duties and document entry as the staff there had no chance or time to do this work but it is important work to keep the records up to date and to put on the digital system.

    The way I see it the museum may as well close altogether as it will certainly not have the trained and qualified staff to keep it in the manner, required by State law, that it should be kept. 

    Would you ask a doctor and an engineer to do the same job? This is what you are asking highly trained staff and curators (plus their volunteers and interns) to do as a result of these (and presumably further) positions being axed. There will be no other jobs for these people in Tasmania so, once again, valuable people will be lost to Tasmania.

    Yours faithfully

    Pam Stewart


  • 04 Oct 2026 2:23 PM | Anonymous

    For the last thirty years I have had a very personal connection with TMAG. For ten years I was a staff member working in the galleries and also in admin. During this time I also became a volunteer tour guide. I retired in 2007, but continued volunteering as a tour guide and also working once a week with the Cultural Heritage staff at Rosny, the Museum’s Collection and Research Centre. After almost 29 years, at the end of last year I reluctantly retired from tour guiding, at nearly 84, I didn’t quite have the energy needed. However, I continue to volunteer at Rosny.

    I have been in a very unique position to work with staff, engage with the mostly international and interstate visitors enthralled with what we have to offer and to also join with the dedicated volunteers who work across the museum’s many diverse areas, in assisting staff with the remarkable work they do for all of us. It is always a joy to have fellow Tasmanians join the museum tours, often confessing they haven’t visited since schooldays and then being amazed at what they now see. Comments included being so reassured we still have items they remember from those all-important school visits, but also today’s presentation of what the museum does.

    Saturdays were usually my tour guiding day, always interesting to see the pattern of what many visitors do. So often they would have been to MONA, or were planning to visit on the Sunday if they were just in Hobart for the weekend. Saturdays were devoted to enjoying Salamanca Market in the morning and TMAG in the afternoon. Over the years, engaging with visitors, it was always interesting to note the MONA effect. Many interstate visitors commented they’d come to Hobart in the early years of MONA, just to have that experience, but visiting TMAG was also included, as much for contrast as any other reason. Repeat visits often also included ‘this time we’re visiting other places in Tasmania’, underlining the importance of cultural heritage.

    How often do you visit TMAG, especially in a private capacity? Have you been to the Herbarium? Do you even know where it’s located? It is also under the TMAG umbrella, but located at UTAS, Sandy Bay. It is not open to the public, but visits can be arranged and seeing the extraordinary work conducted there, is just amazing. The small staff are assisted by dedicated volunteers, taking care of the significant collection, but also doing world leading science and research.

    There have been many budget restraints during my thirty years of close connection with TMAG and I have observed first hand, the devastating effect this has had on the staff and indeed visitors too. From being open to the public seven days a week, closed Christmas Day, Good Friday and ANZAC Day, this has been reduced to six days per week and closing at 4.00 pm each day, instead of 5.00 pm. The loss of this hour alone, especially during the peak tourist season, has been a huge disappointment to so many. I wish you could witness what I would see on my Saturday tour guiding days, family groups and individuals being turned away because of the closing restrictions of 4.00 pm.

    I am once again appalled by the intended cuts to staff in this present climate. This is a totally unacceptable way to treat the highly qualified and gifted staff, who promote and take care of our State collections, many of them working with unique skills in specific areas and working alone, but when their work is denied and the position disappears, we are all the losers. TMAG’s standing and indeed Tasmania’s, in so many areas of important research, risk being damaged irreparably. Likewise, this state’s education system, where the curriculum is enhanced by regular school visits, thanks to the very few dedicated and professional staff, who are responsible for these visits.

    During the decades of tour guiding I have done, one example of change and the importance of it, has been in the interpretation of our indigenous culture and history. When I first began guiding, the ‘aboriginal’ gallery was always of great interest, but told a story from a colonial and European perspective, with comments from visitors at the time, often being simply ignorant, ill informed and frankly, shameful. Thankfully this has changed and I wish you could observe – and indeed the aboriginal community too – the very real thirst most visitors today have for knowing more and more about what really happened here and especially the contemporary history as told in the present gallery ‘Ningina Tunapri’ on the ground floor. The title means to give knowledge and understanding. Have you ever visited the top floor of the 1824 Bond Store? From 2013, this installation tells a very challenging and immersive story.

    On occasions when we have been able to design a specific tour for visitors, to meet their individual interests, sometimes it might be just colonial art, or dinosaurs if children were included or the thylacine or Tasmanian Devil. However, sometimes with restricted time, visitors would ask for a tour giving just our indigenous history. The other popular gallery was “Islands to Ice”, exploring everything to the south of Tasmania, covering the Southern Ocean and Antarctica. However, for most visitors they would leave being amazed by the sheer complexity and diversity of what we are able to show. This is all now under threat.

    TMAG is unique in occupying such an historical site, important in pre colonial years for the first Tasmanians, and important still today in the story it tells. Three of the buildings on site, predate Port Arthur. They are the Commissariat Store, the Private Secretary’s Cottage and the Bond Store. We are unique in being the holders of the State Collection across all disciplines. The staff taking care of this need to be shown more respect and the institution itself should not suffer any more cuts and such an appalling and restricted budget. There is the capacity to do so much more and to tell a bigger story, but resources are needed, not depleted. The human cost of the current proposal is one thing, but the ongoing decline because of it, is reprehensible.

    Surely you can find another solution? Perhaps go and visit TMAG and see for yourself.

    Judith Longhurst,
    Sandy Bay


  • 04 Oct 2026 2:22 PM | Anonymous

    Dear Jane 

    Thank you for taking the time to write and share your concerns regarding the possibility of further job cuts at the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery. I appreciate your thoughtful email and the important points you raise about the role TMAG plays in preserving and sharing Tasmania's cultural, artistic, historical and scientific heritage.

    I have long been a strong supporter of the arts and cultural sector in Tasmania. Over many years I have supported the arts in a range of ways, including through personal financial contributions, attendance at exhibitions, performances and public events, and by speaking in Parliament about the significant value that arts and cultural institutions bring to our communities.

    I agree that TMAG is much more than a visitor attraction. It is a critical state institution that safeguards collections of immense importance to Tasmania and provides educational, cultural and community benefits that extend across the entire state. The programs, exhibitions, research, conservation work and public engagement activities you mention all contribute significantly to Tasmania's social and cultural life.

    I understand the concerns that further staffing reductions could place additional pressure on both collections management and public programs. Maintaining specialist expertise and institutional knowledge is an important consideration whenever decisions are made about the resourcing of cultural institutions.

    I will continue to advocate for appropriate levels of funding for the arts broadly as well as TMAG. TMAG and our other arts organisations are critical to our health and wellbeing and must be recognised as such.

    Thank you again for writing and for your ongoing advocacy through the Friends of the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery. I value hearing from people who are deeply engaged with protecting and promoting Tasmania's cultural heritage, and I appreciate the contribution you continue to make.

    Kind regards,

    Ruth

    Hon Ruth Forrest MLC (she/her)
    Independent Member for Murchison
    Deputy President
    Chair of Committees
    Parliament of Tasmania
    IWF Australia Member
    2025 Inductee - Better Politics Foundation - Politicians’ Hall of Fame for Democratic Innovation

    www.ruthforrest.com.au


  • 04 Oct 2026 2:20 PM | Anonymous

    To the Editor:

    I think we all accept that the Tasmanian government needs to address the state’s projected deficit and growing debt as a matter of urgency. However, to take a fiscal knife to the state’s cultural institutions is surely not the way to proceed. The Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery is facing a cut in the region of 30% of its salary expenses, which will result in the institution losing numerous staff at all levels — 19.7 full-time equivalent positions according to a report in the ABC News app. Some have already gone; as others go it is hard to see how TMAG will be able to maintain its current high standard of operations into the future.

    Thankfully, the CPSU has made this a public issue, which, of course TMAG staff have been unable to do. Disingenuously, the government has rejected the union’s claim and stated that TMAG is not required to reduce its staff by 30%. However, it has not denied that TMAG is required to cut its salary budget by something in the region of 30%. The government is therefore playing with semantics when it denies the staffing cuts; moreover, voluntary redundancies and natural attrition are strategies to reduce staffing levels that do not necessarily lead to cuts in the best places or ensure that this important cultural institution, arguably the most important cultural institution in the state, can continue to deliver the service that Tasmanians and visitors alike expect.

    It is particularly poignant that cultural institutions like TMAG are again facing the razor while wealthy sports like the AFL and the NBL benefit from government largesse. Of course the stadium will attract visitors to Tasmania; but so do our cultural institutions.

    As a committee member of the Friends of TMAG I help organise regular events for our members and the community at large that are invariably well attended. The government’s planned cuts put these events in jeopardy, too, as they can only proceed with the support of TMAG staff.

    The barbarians are knocking at the door; we need to defend TMAG and other cultural institutions for our children and grandchildren, because once they have gone or their operations reduced, it will be hard to restore the knowledge and expertise that is lost.

    Ralph Crane
    Bellerive


  • 04 Oct 2026 2:17 PM | Anonymous

    Dear Friends of the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery
     
     
    Thank you for contacting me about the government’s proposed staff and resource cuts to our precious Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG). 
     

    TMAG is a pillar of our state and must be supported to continue to thrive, not undermined. It holds a special place in the heart of Tasmanians. 
     

    I was disappointed to read reports 20 TMAG jobs are on the chopping block and then confused when Deputy Premier Guy Barnett said those reports were false but said that "across government there need to be efficiencies".    
     

    As the independent member for Clark, I’m grateful TMAG sits firmly in my electorate. I will add your letter to the many others I’ve received on this issue and advocate on behalf of your view and the others. 
     

    It’s infuriating we are fighting to save TMAG as stories of government waste and cost blowouts mount almost daily, and of course while spending on the AFL stadium boondoggle takes priority. 
     

    I support sensible budget repair and fair share revenue raising. Undermining TMAG though is not a sensible option.   
     

    You can find out more information about how I would approach budget repair and other issues of concern and advocacy at kristiejohnston.com.au or by following me on Facebook. 
     

    You may also be interested in how the proposed electoral boundary changes may change who is your local representatives. You can find further information here. 
     

     
    Thank you for advocating for TMAG. I appreciate you getting in touch. 
     

     
    Kind regards 
     
    Kristie 


  • 04 Oct 2026 2:15 PM | Anonymous

    Dear Mr Jaensch

    I am writing to you as a former senior curator of cultural heritage and a current committee member of the Friends of the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery to voice my deep concern about the mooted cuts to TMAG and its staff. TMAG is a well-loved and trusted Tasmanian institution which has operated for around 180 years.

    TMAG, the second oldest museum in Australia, has a statutory requirement to care for and grow the State art, cultural heritage and art collection. It already does this under enormous financial and staffing constraint, working off a budget much smaller than its interstate counterparts. The museum is one of the most visited places in Tasmania, with similar numbers to our most visited national park, Freycinet, and only a few less than the highly promoted MONA and Port Arthur Historic Sites. Thus it not only has cultural, scientific and artistic significance but also is an important driver in the Tasmanian economy.

    TMAG runs a vibrant and successful public program, with exhibitions, talks, events and a very popular schools program. Every year thousands of school children from southern Tasmania and elsewhere enhance their education by visiting the museum and taking part in specialist programs run by highly skilled staff. These public programs again fulfil statutory requirements under the 2017 Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery Act.

    TMAG overachieves in comparison to its mainland counterparts - with its small staff and budget it regularly wins national awards for its exhibitions. Budget constraints have already meant that exhibition turnover has been reduced markedly. The museum’s research collections which are managed by a dedicated staff of curators and collection managers are central to its operations. Many scientific collections require regular maintenance to ensure their longevity - these include botanical and faunal specimens dating to the early nineteenth century and which are regularly used by local, national and international scholars and institutions to research key questions facing us all today. TMAG has a hard-won reputation as an outstanding museum and research facility.

    TMAG has recently lost critical staff members, including one of its two art curators and its paper conservator along with other staff, with no sign of their being replaced. 

    My fear is that the mooted cuts will further erode the already inadequate staff needed to fulfil its statutory obligations, thus placing its collections, programs and research reputation at serious risk. This is turn is a serious risk to Tasmania’s reputation as a State in which the arts, culture and science are taken seriously and add significant value to the Tasmanian economy and brand as a clever forward thinking State attractive to investors and those looking for a place to relocate to.

    I urge to you ensure that TMAG is spared staff and budgetary cuts and indeed receives an increased budgetary allocation to enable it to fulfil its charter.

    I thank you for taking the time to consider this important issue and look forward to many more years of a thriving museum and art gallery.

     

    Ian Terry
    Hobart


  • 04 Oct 2026 2:14 PM | Anonymous

    Subject: Oppose staff reductions at TMAG

    Dear Member of Parliament,

    Tasmania requires both economic ambition and strong cultural, educational and scientific institutions; these goals are complementary, not competing.

    I urge you to oppose the proposed staff reductions at the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) and to advocate for complete transparency regarding the number of positions at risk and the services that may be affected.

    You know that TMAG is far more than a museum. As Tasmania's leading cultural and natural heritage institution, it combines the functions of a museum, art gallery and herbarium, and is entrusted with the care of nearly one million items held in the State Collection. These collections preserve the stories of Tasmania's people, landscapes, biodiversity and history, and represent an irreplaceable public asset.

    Importantly, a collection has value only when it is supported by the expertise required to conserve, document, interpret and share it. TMAG's staff provide the specialist knowledge that enables exhibitions, educational programs, scientific research, conservation activities, collection management, community engagement and the protection of culturally significant material. Once these skills are lost, they are extraordinarily difficult and costly to rebuild.

    TMAG is also an important contributor to Tasmania's economy and reputation. More than 280,000 visitors attended TMAG in 2024-25, with a significant proportion coming from interstate and overseas. The institution is a major drawcard for visitors, an educational resource for schools and universities, and a source of pride for all Tasmanians.

    Whether cuts fall on public-facing roles or behind-the-scenes specialists, the result will inevitably be diminished capability. Reduced staffing means fewer exhibitions, fewer educational opportunities, reduced research capacity, less community engagement, and greater risk to the long-term stewardship of Tasmania's cultural, scientific and Aboriginal heritage.

    At a time when Tasmanians are asked to make difficult choices about public expenditure, decisions affecting irreplaceable institutions such as TMAG must be made based on evidence, transparency and a clear understanding of the long-term consequences. Heritage collections are easy to neglect, but the resulting damage can take decades to repair, if it can be repaired at all.

    I therefore ask you to:

    • Publicly oppose staff reductions that would undermine TMAG's core functions;

    • Call for full disclosure of the number and nature of positions proposed for removal;

    • Require an immediate assessment of the impacts of these proposed staff reductions on collections, research, education and visitor services; and

    • Support sustainable funding arrangements that protect this institution for future generations.

    Cultural guardianship is not an optional extra, it is the glue for Tasmania’s communities. Tasmania's heritage is not a discretionary luxury. It is part of our identity, our educational infrastructure, our tourism offering and our legacy to future generations. We cannot afford to diminish it through short-term savings measures that may create far greater long-term costs.

    More broadly, the proposed $1.5 billion public-sector savings program raises legitimate questions about Tasmania's priorities and the long-term consequences of reducing public-service capability. While fiscal responsibility is important, savings achieved through the loss of specialist expertise in institutions such as TMAG risk imposing costs that are not immediately visible in budget papers. Heritage knowledge, curatorial expertise, scientific collections management and educational capacity are difficult, and sometimes even impossible, to replace once lost. Investments in major infrastructure projects may deliver important benefits, but they must not come at the expense of the institutions that preserve Tasmania's identity, knowledge and cultural legacy. Tasmania requires both economic ambition and strong cultural, educational and scientific institutions; these goals are complementary, not competing.

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Holger Meinke

    New Town


  • 04 Oct 2026 2:12 PM | Anonymous

    Dear warm hearted workers on the front line,

    I am a friend of TMAG. I have been a regular visitor for all my adult life, and when I became a grandmother I took the children when they were of an appropriate age to learn about the natural environment, spending hours in the collections, drawing specimens, year after year, and we would take the lift up to the Antarctic collection and pull out the drawers to admire penguins and seabirds. Some days were spent in different areas, they know their way around now, and could lead groups themselves!

    We would cross the road and have fish and chips at Mures. A family tradition.

    I was a teacher and accompanied groups to TMAG, and as a practicing artist I continue to visit to visit every new exhibition and special shows in the natural history area. TMAG, along with the Maritime Museum and the Allport are among my favourite places to take visitors. I meet there with artist friends and we always spend hours longer than we intend.

    My role as a grandmother is the one I take most seriously. The future of maintaining integrity is in the hands of the next generation and I hope I have had some input into their development as responsible caretakers of our exquisite island.

    As a result of their rich nature-based childhood experiences, two of them have decided to study next year at uni to become Marine Scientists. One wants to focus on the Antarctic.

    I had an idea of something which might be worth following up. I am not longer able to be on the front lines organising such events, as much as I have curated many exhibitions and events over thirty years to raise awareness about environmental issues and human rights. 

    Sir David Attenborough visited TMAG, I remember reading of the land snail/slug named in his honour. I recall watching the ABC documentary created from his visit. It was such a landmark happening! And isn’t he everyone’s favourite? 

    If David was approached, he might be willing to have a short video made in which he speaks up for TMAG and the importance of its legacy to all Tasmanians and the world.

    This could be played large on the side of a building. Fanciful as it may seem, I thought it would be fantastic to have a pageant of children dressed as Tasmanian fauna, flora, insects etc, walking down Macquarie Street and ending up at TMAG where the video could be projected at the entrance. I’m sure some schools would be behind it and use it as a way to educate children about their role in conservation and as cultural gatekeepers of the future.

    There you have it. 

    In good faith and with ongoing vigorous hope for the opening of a fresh awareness in those who make decisions on behalf of us all.

    Warmly, 

    Desiree Fitzgibbon.

    Via email 2026-10-04


  • 04 Oct 2026 10:45 AM | Anonymous

    Tas Field Nats concern at proposed restructure of TMAG

    Proposed reductions in staffing at TMAG have the potential to affect the core business of the Tas Field Nats - which is the study of all aspects of natural history and to advocate for the conservation of our natural heritage. The TMAG has had a long history of involvement with the Tas Field Nats in providing support for our study of Tasmania’s distinctive natural environment.

    One of the proposals for restructure at the TMAG is to merge the Senior Curator for Invertebrate Zoology position with the Senior Curator for Vertebrate Zoology into one. These are two highly specialised and distinct fields.

    The two current incumbents, Dr Simon Grove and Dr David Hocking, will be well known to most TFNC members through their presentations to the Club, their articles in The Tasmanian Naturalist and their regular appearance in the media.

    David spoke at the Tas Field Nats in November 2024 on Fossils of Tasmania: A Deep Time Journey through Prehistory and followed up leading our members on an excursion to Mt Knocklofty to look for fossils. Simon has also given presentations to the Club, and was nominated by the Tas Field Nats Club for the Natural History Medallion, which he was duly awarded. Simon is also author of Seashells of Tasmania, an essential companion for beachcombing in Tasmania, as well as Seasons in the South, in which he relates the ‘back-stories’ for many of Tasmania’s more unusual or distinctive invertebrates.

    Simon’s knowledge of invertebrate taxonomy, species discovery and distribution is highly specialised, as is David’s work in vertebrate zoology, palaeontology, threatened species and wildlife health. If there were only one Zoology curator, that person would be expected to report across both specialised areas, on everything from identifying deep-sea molluscs to performing Tasmanian devil necropsies and tissue preparation, plus all the other things that the two curators currently do as experts in their individual disciplines. The effect would be to diminish Tasmania’s scientific expertise in both areas. It is, indeed, untenable.


Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software